15+
Moratoria & Pauses
passed at the local, county, or state level
66%
Voter Approval
for Port Washington's nation-first referendum
4
Council Members Ousted
in Festus, MO after a data center vote
19%
Reports Citing Secrecy
of community submissions mention NDAs, secret deals, meetings, or no public voice
When residents and councils want time to study the impact before approving more data centers, they're enacting temporary pauses. These moratoriums vary in duration and scope, but they share a goal: don't let the buildout get ahead of the planning.
Orange County, North Carolina
One-year moratorium passed unanimously
On April 22, 2026, the Orange County Board of Commissioners voted 6–0 for a one-year pause on large data centers — including AI training, data processing, and crypto mining — to give staff time to revise the county's land use policies before any applications arrive.
Olyphant Borough, Pennsylvania
Six-month halt on data center development
Olyphant Borough Council voted 4–3 to halt new data center development for six months while it drafts an AI data center ordinance, after residents raised alarms about plans clustering across Lackawanna County.
Calvert County, Maryland
Commissioners moving toward 24-month moratorium
After concerns over the proposed Appeal Digital Park in Lusby, Calvert County commissioners voted unanimously to begin exploring a 24-month moratorium on data center approvals — long enough for a comprehensive public study covering power, water, and land impacts.
Nassau County, Florida
Moratorium proposal passes first reading
A proposed Nassau County moratorium would temporarily stop the county from accepting, reviewing, or approving any data center applications. The measure cleared its first reading; a second public hearing was set for June 8.
Maine (Statewide)
First-ever statewide moratorium passed the legislature
Maine's legislature passed what would have been the nation's first statewide moratorium on large AI data centers, citing concerns about the grid and energy costs. Governor Janet Mills vetoed it because it didn't carve out an exception for a planned site in Jay, but advocates say the legislative win is a model other states can build on.
Hill County, Texas
First Texas county to pause data center construction (3–2)
On May 12, 2026 the Hill County Commissioners Court voted 3–2 for a one-year moratorium on data center construction in unincorporated areas — the first such pause by a Texas county. The decision came after residents raised concerns about a proposed 300-acre Provident Data Centers project in north Hillsboro and its noise, water, and electricity impacts. The county attorney warned commissioners they may face lawsuits.
Baltimore, Maryland
City Council passes one-year moratorium on large data centers
The Baltimore City Council passed a one-year moratorium on construction of data centers that draw 10 MW or more of power. The bill orders a nine-month study covering energy infrastructure, ratepayer impact, the local economy, and environmental and public health concerns. Baltimore and Carroll counties had already passed similar moratoria earlier in 2026.
Boone County, Indiana
Commissioners weighing moratorium near Lebanon mega-site
Boone County commissioners are actively considering a moratorium on new data centers, prompted by the Meta Lebanon (LEAP) campus — a $10B / 1 GW project across 1,500 acres — and the rapidly stacking proposals around it. Indianapolis's City-County Council also unanimously passed a symbolic May 4 resolution urging the Metropolitan Development Commission to pause approvals.
Pennsylvania (Multiple Municipalities)
Townships back 180-day pauses to write their own rules
Townships across Pennsylvania are adopting 180-day moratoria on data centers so they can draft local ordinances "in peace" before applications arrive. The wave follows Olyphant's earlier six-month halt and reflects organizing across Lackawanna, Luzerne, and Chester counties.
When elected officials don't listen, residents are taking it directly to the polls — passing referenda, signing petitions, and voting out the leaders who approved unpopular projects.
Port Washington, Wisconsin
Nation's first anti-data-center referendum (66% yes)
On April 7, 2026, Port Washington voters approved by ~66% an ordinance requiring future Tax Incremental Districts of $10M+ to first win voter approval. The measure was put on the ballot by grassroots group Great Lakes Neighbors United, which collected over 1,000 signatures.
Festus, Missouri
Voters oust half the city council
Weeks after the Festus City Council approved a $6B CRG/Clayco data center 6–2 over public objection, voters removed four of the eight council members. A petition is now circulating to remove the remaining members and the mayor.
Multiple States
Data centers head to the ballot in 2026
Beyond Port Washington, voters in Nevada, California, and Maryland are pursuing their own ballot initiatives to give residents more control over data center tax breaks, zoning, and water use.
Local planning and zoning commissions have legitimate authority to deny rezoning requests and conditional use permits. In multiple states they've used it.
Killeen, Texas
Planning & Zoning denied data center permit
Killeen's Planning & Zoning Commission denied a permit for a proposed data center on a nearly three-acre vacant property on South Fort Hood Street. Residents had raised concerns about water shortage, air pollution, and noise.
Pacific, Missouri (Franklin Co.)
P&Z recommends denial of $16B Beltline Energy project
After an 11-hour March meeting and packed opposition, Franklin County Planning & Zoning recommended denial of the $16B Beltline Energy data center 4–5 in April 2026. A community Facebook group, "No AI Data Centers in Franklin County," has over 3,000 members.
Fort Meade, Florida
State officials and water managers block hyperscale plan
Florida's Commerce Secretary Alex Kelly called Project Stonebridge (a $2.6B / 1.2 GW hyperscale plan) "fundamentally flawed" over water, energy, and transportation risks. The Southwest Florida Water Management District blocked use of Fort Meade's existing infrastructure for the project.
East Vincent Township, Pennsylvania
Pennhurst site data center rejected unanimously
On May 21, 2026, East Vincent Township officials unanimously rejected a controversial 1.9-million-square-foot data center proposed for the historic Pennhurst State School and Hospital site. The decision capped months of resident campaigning. The developer has signaled plans to appeal, likely setting up a court battle.
Montour County, Pennsylvania
Rezoning of 1,000 acres of farmland denied
A request to rezone nearly 1,000 acres of farmland from agricultural to industrial — to enable a Talen Energy gas plant expansion and adjacent data center campus — was unanimously denied by the county after sustained community opposition.
When approvals go through anyway, residents are turning to the courts.
Festus, Missouri
Opposition group sues city and developer
Wake Up JeffCo and four property owners filed suit in St. Louis County against the City of Festus and developer CRG, seeking to reverse the city's rezoning vote and the development agreement with the data center developer.
Sulphur Springs, Texas
Multiple data-center lawsuits proceed
A judge denied a major motion from the City of Sulphur Springs in pending data center lawsuits surrounding the 1,677-acre Matrix Data Center campus, allowing the legal challenge to move forward.
Amazon (Multistate)
$20.5M class-action settlement over pollution
Amazon agreed to a $20.5M settlement in a class action alleging an AWS data center in Eastern Oregon contributed to nitrate contamination of community drinking water. The case is being watched closely by communities considering similar projects.
Before lawsuits or moratoria, residents are gathering, signing, and speaking up.
Mercer County, Kentucky
1,700+ residents petition against farmland data center
After learning of a 500-acre data center proposed on prime Mercer County farmland — a project that could use 110M gallons of water per year — more than 1,700 residents signed a petition opposing it, with hundreds gathering at public meetings.
Genesee County, New York
Concerns voiced over $19.4B STAMP plan
Residents of the town of Alabama, NY have packed public meetings to raise concerns about Stream Data Centers' proposed $19.4B / 2.2M sq ft campus at the STAMP industrial park — including the ~$1.4B in tax subsidies on offer. The project still needs final environmental and site-plan approval.
Box Elder County, Utah
Rural Utah pushes back on 9 GW O'Leary plan
Plans for Kevin O'Leary's 9-gigawatt "Stratos Project" — which would draw more than twice the state's current electricity use — have galvanized a rural Utah protest movement, drawing national attention.
Lebanon, Indiana (Meta LEAP)
Residents press Sen. Braun and lawmakers to regulate
Residents from Lebanon's Meta LEAP zone — a $10B / 1 GW / 1,500-acre campus already breaking ground — joined neighbors from across Indiana in pressing Sen. Braun and state lawmakers to regulate the rapidly expanding industry. Indiana now has 123+ community reports across multiple emerging hotspots.
Sulphur Springs, Texas
Texas's most-reported community keeps organizing
Sulphur Springs (Hopkins County) has produced nearly 300 community reports — by far the largest cluster in Erin's inbox — driven by the 1,677-acre Matrix Data Center campus. Residents have packed council meetings, filed multiple lawsuits, and won a key motion to keep the legal challenge moving forward in 2026.
Community pressure is translating into bills at every level of government.
U.S. Senate & House
Sanders & Ocasio-Cortez introduce federal moratorium bill
Senator Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez introduced the Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act (S. 4214) — a federal pause on new AI data centers until national safeguards on environment, energy, labor, and civil liberties are in place.
Tom Green County, Texas
County commissioners call for stronger state regulation
The Tom Green County (San Angelo) Commissioners Court unanimously adopted a resolution calling on Texas to strengthen statewide data center regulation around water, the electric grid, and infrastructure impact.
Across the U.S.
14 data center bills filed across 6 states in 2026
Tracking by AI Laws by State counts 14 published AI / data center bills across six state legislatures in 2026, ranging from energy-cost shifting onto operators to outright moratoria and disclosure mandates.
Wisconsin (Statewide)
Bill to ban data center NDAs advances after secrecy scandal
After investigative reporting revealed that at least four Wisconsin communities — Beaver Dam, Kenosha, Janesville, Menomonie, and Beloit — signed nondisclosure agreements with data center developers, lawmakers introduced legislation to ban the practice statewide. The Assembly adjourned without passing the bill; the Senate vote remains uncertain. Nearly 1 in 5 reports to Erin's office cite NDAs, secret deals, or being shut out of meetings — making this a national pattern, not a Wisconsin-only one.
Minnesota (Statewide)
Coalition pushes NDA ban after Farmington, Pine Island organizing
Residents from Farmington, Hermantown, Pine Island, and other Minnesota cities organized in support of banning NDAs in data center deals, arguing that secrecy lets local officials hand unpopular projects a head start before opposition can form. The Minnesota House setback in April hasn't ended the effort — coalition organizers say a narrow path forward remains.
Texas (Statewide)
Texas Ag Commissioner calls for statewide hyperscale pause
Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller publicly called for a temporary moratorium on new hyperscale data center development in Texas, citing strain on water, electricity, and rural land. Texas — with 612 community reports, the most of any state — has been a flashpoint for the buildout.
Oklahoma (Statewide)
Ratepayer Protection Act becomes law
Governor Kevin Stitt signed HB 2992, the "Data Center Consumer Ratepayer Protection Act of 2026," into law on May 11. The act regulates how large AI data center projects are handled from a utility cost perspective — aimed at ensuring residential ratepayers don't subsidize hyperscale buildouts.